

The Fedora Chronicles Best Picture for 2002
|
When it was first released
for the theaters, folks were telling me it was a movie about Tom Hanks
as a hit man who has to protect his son after the boy watched a killing.
Putting it that simply betrays the complexity of the story. One rainy
night, the younger Michael Sullivan
[Tyler
Hoechlin] sneaks into the back of his fathers car only to witness his
own father gun down two bootleggers after seeing the mob-boss’s son
crack a round into the head of someone who he was interrogating. The
added complexity of the sub-plot line not mentioned in typical
descriptions of the film is two different Generations over lapping in
the fight for the attention of their father figures… The younger
Michael Sullivan wishing he had the kind of attention his younger
brother Peter [Liam Aiken] receives while Connor Rooney [Daniel Craig]
wishes he receives the kind of attention the elder Michael Sullivan
enjoys from the local crime-boss, John Rooney [Paul Newman]. Both
struggles lead up to one series of explosive results.
The close-knit extended family within the town run by the Rooney’s is shattered after Connor tries to eliminate the evidence of something far more sinister behind the ‘hit’ the young Michael Sullivan witnessed. Any slim chance of things getting to how they were before half of the Sullivan family is killed is shattered once and for all when John Rooney has to give the OK to have the surviving Sullivan’s killed. It’s a regrettable authorization from the elder Mister Rooney, understandably so when it's clear that he regards the Sullivan boys as his own grandchildren and his enforcer- Michael Sullivan Sr. – as his favorite “son”. While on the run, the two Michael Sullivan’s try to piece together what happened. They are being chased by Maguire [Jude Law] a genuine psychopath who not only enjoys his work of being a killer for hire, but also as a photographer… as if taking pictures of the dead is some hybrid of necrophilia and pornography. It’s after the first encounter and exchange of bullets that force the two Sullivan’s to truly work and grow together. It’s the first real time that these two are able to develop some kind of relationship, after all the previous years of the father being a monolithic and mysterious figure, while it would seem the son was just another mouth to feed.
Michael Sullivan returns back home to confront Paul Rooney when he finally uncovers what Connor has been up to. In the exchange under the church the two characters give the final meaning to the title of the movie: John
Rooney: There are only murderers in this room! Michael! Open your
eyes! This is the life we chose, the life we lead. And there is only
one guarantee: none of us will see heaven. Perdition… hell, the one place the Senior Sullivan knows he’s destined to drag his family down to because of choices he made years ago out of the desperation to provide for them. Now, his only purpose is to prevent that from happening to his son. Then it becomes clear that the only way to end this is to end the reign of the Rooney's. Killing them isn’t so much a matter of revenge. Even more poignant in this motion picture is the crusade to save his son’s soul. |
| Road
to Perdition clearly illustrates what all good fathers know, that
doing what ever they must do to help their children becomes second
nature the day they are born. Children add an extra dimension to the
lives of fathers, making their offspring’s well being far more important
then their own. Tom Hanks does a brilliant job to portray this concept
as his character moves from villainous hit man with heart to the near
perfect father struggling for the right words to convey how he loved
both son equally but differently.
Road to Perdition is the perfect Flick to hold you over … it has enough Fedora’s and guns for two or three movies. I would encourage everyone to actually go out and buy this motion picture on DVD or VHS if possible. I have no stake in DreamWorks, other then finding every way to encourage them to make more period pieces like Road to Perdition. |
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Your thoughts? Do you have your own review to share? - Visit us on The Forum - You can read other reviews by Eric Renderking Fisk in his Archive... © Copyright The Fedora Chronicles - 2006 |
|
| [1]Excerpted from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition © 1996 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation; further reproduction and distribution in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved. |