By
Eric 'Renderking' Fisk, Rindge NH (Originally published on
The Indy Experience in 2002)
I’m going on a limb here
as I set out to write my next review by featuring a motion picture outside
the normal boundaries of my usual criteria. Usually I only review movies
that were either the inspiration for current period films, or
in someway capture the essence of adventure and discovery. One of my
major boundaries were that all the movies I review must either take place
in the decades leading up to, during or after World War 2. If not, the
movies must take place in the here and now. I vowed never to review
Science Fiction movies that take place in the future in fear of breaking
the Raiders Karma. The whole
idea of “flicks to hold you over” is to find movies that remind you
of the bare bones, threadbare, gimmick free exploits during a time when
men wore suits and hats… not polyester jumpers and molded aluminum fittings.
To repent of breaking my vow or self imposed rules, I’ll do 3 Humphrey Bogart’s, All the Thin
Man’s and the two Tom Clancy movies starring Harrison Ford. (I’ll even
do Hanover Street if I can find a copy to refresh my memory.)
Anyway… both Wrath of
Khan and Raiders bare quite a few similarities and were
both released from Paramount a year apart, and both had F/X done by
ILM. I know it’s a stretch…
The Background...
One of the other reasons
why Wrath of Khan is because of the rich history… Much
like Lucas and Spielberg, Gene Roddenberry was hooked on serial movies
and SF pulp anthology magazines of his era. Roddenberry had it in his
head that he would someday he would create a Science Fiction venue where
he could tell morality tales. After work on a few movies and television
shows, the World War II hero in the Army Air Corps, Pan-American
pilot, police and freelance writer officer finally got the go-ahead
for his own series that he sold as “’Wagon Train’ to the stars.” The
rest of his story is a study on how one man’s idea can
become diluted then polluted by know-nothing studio executives whose
only concern was selling commercial airtime and appeasing the censors.
What could have been one of the greatest Television series using a starship
as a metaphor for the American experience became a laughing stock about
men in funky colored velour uniforms and cheep effects. If not that,
then about obsessive rabid fans who trivialized the message by being
preoccupied over factoids such as the combination to the captain’s safe.
Return to Its Essence...
After the success of “The
Motion Picture” (good, not great) the studio pundits had the nerve to
make another movie in the "Star Trek" franchise. What would been the second and
last movie, all the stops were pulled. The
thought was that If it was going to be the last time the crew would
get together, everything that could have been done would now be done
(short of an all out war with the metaphorical representatives of the
Cold War Soviet Union, the Klingons).
I’ll spare you the elaborate
story on how Nicholas Meyer took the helm, but it was his fresh approach
to The Franchise as an outsider-turned-Director and as an unaccredited
screenwriter (With Harve Bennett) that made the movie a classic. Not
only did they make a classic, but also they saved the franchise. Meyer’s
whole approach to the Franchise was to make The Wrath of Khan
more like the real U.S. Navy; more like the “Horatio Hornblower”
that was one of the original inspirations of Roddenberry’s. Unlike the
previous movie, one could feel the cold depths of space; the starship
feels more like the real thing and not just a set on the Paramount lot.
With little extra detail, changes in lighting and new costumes, the
whole experience feels more nautical. What’s
more, Meyer seemed to “get it” more then many of the people around him.
Meyer had a better idea of what The Franchise was supposed to be, even
though he had yet to meet Roddenberry until after they wrapped production.
The Wrath of Raiders Connection...
Believe it or not, The Wrath Of Khan
bares some striking resemblance to
Raiders. The first is about the search and recovery of
an object like the Ark, an item of unspeakable power that has the ability
of giving life or take it away on huge scale, and it even has a biblical
name. The Lost Ark of this movie is the Geneses Device.
Wrath
of Khan and
Raiders also have a main character dealing with a reconcilable past,
a long lost lover who returns into his life as part of the quest of
the powerful artifact, at least one close steadfast companion/sidekick.
(One of the reasons why both Spock and Sallah work as sidekicks is the
simple fact neither are there for show or for laughs. If anything, they’re
interracial parts of the story and the heroes may not have succeeded
with out them.) While both objects are found after deductions that are
both lucky and inspired genius, Both hero’s of these films are someone
lovable losers who have the objects they’re chasing after stolen form
them right after being recovered. Both movies climax with the incredible
unavailing of the powerful and destructive forces, both movies end on
Melancholy notes that still seem to inspire wonder. If anything,
Wrath of Khan is the Naval Space Opera version of
Raiders of the Lost Ark.
Both Wrath of
Khan and Raiders of the Lost Ark represent a better
time for Paramount, a brief hey-day that would later prove to be
one of the most successful periods of the Studio’s history.
|